Any audio interface with a high-impedance Hi-Z instrument input can record guitar cleanly β the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Gen 4 at $129 is the best starting point for most guitarists. For amp simulator performance, prioritize monitoring latency below 5ms round-trip and a clean 24-bit converter. The Universal Audio Volt 176 at $249 adds a hardware 1176-style compressor for more dynamic control on the way in.
This article contains affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This does not affect our editorial independence β all recommendations are based on genuine assessment.
Updated May 2026 by The Music Production Wiki Team.
The audio interface is the gateway between your guitar and your DAW. Its job is to convert the analog signal from your instrument into digital audio that your computer can record, and to deliver that conversion with the lowest possible noise, the most accurate tone preservation, and the lowest possible latency. For guitarists, two additional requirements apply: the interface must have a proper Hi-Z instrument input that loads guitar pickups correctly, and it should deliver enough monitoring speed to make playing through amp simulators feel responsive and natural.
Most audio interface buying guides focus on microphone preamp quality β useful for vocalists and acoustic instrument recording but secondary for guitarists using DI capture and amp simulator plugins. The factors that actually matter for guitar recording are different: Hi-Z input impedance, monitoring latency, converter resolution, and how well the interface integrates with your amp sim workflow. This guide focuses on those factors specifically and ranks every option against them.
This guide covers the best audio interfaces for guitarists at every budget in 2026, from a first interface under $130 to a professional studio tool approaching $700.
What Matters for Guitarists Specifically
Before diving into specific products, it is worth establishing the criteria that separate a good guitar interface from a good interface in general. These are not the same thing, and conflating them leads to buying decisions that optimize for the wrong specifications.
Hi-Z Input Impedance
Hi-Z (high impedance) inputs are the single most important feature for direct guitar recording. A passive guitar pickup is a high-impedance source β it generates a signal that depends on seeing a high load impedance to perform correctly. When you plug a guitar into a standard line-level or microphone input, the lower impedance of those inputs loads the pickups incorrectly, causing a rolloff in high-frequency response, a reduction in output level, and a general dulling of the guitar's natural tone.
A proper Hi-Z instrument input presents an input impedance of typically 1 MΞ© (one megaohm) or higher. At that impedance, the pickups see essentially no load and behave as the guitar designer intended. The difference between using a Hi-Z input and a standard line input is not subtle β it is the difference between your guitar sounding like itself and sounding like a muffled, low-output version of itself. Every interface on this list has at least one proper Hi-Z instrument input.
For a deeper dive into the technical principles behind audio interface selection, see our complete audio interface buying guide.
Monitoring Latency
Latency is the delay between plucking a string and hearing the processed sound through your headphones or monitors. For guitar playing, this delay is acutely noticeable at anything above approximately 10ms round-trip (the time from input to output through the interface and DAW). At 20ms or more, playing through amp simulators feels like playing through wet concrete β the disconnect between your physical action and the audible result is large enough to disrupt timing and feel.
Modern interfaces combat this with two approaches: driver-level buffer size reduction (ASIO on Windows, Core Audio on Mac), and direct monitoring β routing the input signal directly to the output at the hardware level, bypassing the computer entirely. Direct monitoring is the most effective solution for zero-latency monitoring, though it means you hear the dry, unprocessed guitar signal rather than your amp sim. For amp sim use specifically, look for interfaces that support low-latency driver operation at 32 or 64 sample buffer sizes, which yields round-trip latency of approximately 3-6ms at 44.1 kHz β below the threshold of perceptible delay for most players.
Converter Quality
The analog-to-digital converter (ADC) is responsible for capturing the DI guitar signal as faithfully as possible. Higher dynamic range in the converter means more headroom between the noise floor and the point of digital clipping β important for capturing the full dynamic range of a guitar performance, from delicate fingerpicking to aggressive pick attacks. A converter with 118-120dB of dynamic range captures more of that range cleanly than one with 108dB.
For amp simulator workflows, converter quality has a direct effect on the quality of the processed result. Amp simulators like Neural DSP Archetype, Line 6 Helix Native, and TONEX are sophisticated enough that they will reveal differences in input quality β a cleaner, more accurate DI capture translates directly to a more convincing amp sim result.
Preamp Headroom
Guitarists who also record miked sources β vocals, acoustic guitar, drum room mics β need preamp gain and headroom alongside their Hi-Z input. The preamp specifications matter here in the same way they do for any other recording source. Most interfaces in the budget category provide adequate preamp performance for home studio use; the differences become audible primarily when recording dynamic microphones that require high gain settings (above 50dB) in quiet tracking environments.
For live amp sim use (playing through plugins in real time), latency is the primary concern. For re-amping workflows β where you record a dry DI track first and process it later β latency is irrelevant, and converter quality becomes the dominant factor. If you re-amp exclusively, you can tolerate higher latency and should invest more in converter quality. If you play live through amp sims, prioritize an interface with documented low-latency driver performance.
Quick Comparison: Best Guitar Interfaces 2026
| Interface | Price | Hi-Z Inputs | Dynamic Range | Key Feature for Guitarists |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focusrite Scarlett Solo Gen 4 | $129 | 1 | 120dB | Auto Gain, best budget option |
| Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Gen 4 | $199 | 2 | 120dB | Two inputs, stereo monitoring, Clip Safe |
| Universal Audio Volt 176 | $249 | 1 | 120dB | Hardware 1176-style compressor on input |
| Audient iD14 MkII | $299 | 1 | 129dB | Class-A preamps, exceptional converter clarity |
| Universal Audio Apollo Twin X | $699 | 1 (Unison) | 129dB | UAD DSP, Unison impedance modeling |
The Best Audio Interfaces for Guitarists β Full Reviews
1. Focusrite Scarlett Solo Gen 4 β Best Budget Pick
Price: $129
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo Gen 4 is the correct first audio interface for guitarists who are just starting out or who only need one input at a time. The front panel has one Hi-Z instrument input and one combination XLR/TRS microphone input, covering the two most common home recording scenarios simultaneously. Plug your guitar into the instrument input and a microphone into the XLR input for recording vocals and guitar at the same time if needed β the two channels are independent and can operate simultaneously.
The fourth-generation preamps deliver 69dB of clean gain, which is sufficient for condenser microphones and adequate for most dynamic microphones. The Auto Gain feature sets optimal input levels automatically by analyzing the input signal for 10 seconds β useful for guitarists who find gain staging unintuitive or who are setting up a quick session without time to dial in levels manually.
The dynamic range of 120dB on line outputs is exceptional for this price point and ensures the DI guitar signal is captured cleanly with substantial headroom for amp simulator processing. The USB-C connection provides bus power from the computer β no external power supply required. Focusrite's ASIO driver on Windows performs well at low buffer sizes, and Core Audio on Mac handles the interface without issue. Round-trip latency at 64-sample buffer size is approximately 4-5ms, which is comfortably below the perceptibility threshold for live amp sim use.
The software bundle included with the Solo Gen 4 is substantial: Ableton Live Lite, Pro Tools Intro, and the Hitmaker Expansion with plugins from iZotope, Antares, Softube, and others. For a guitarist new to home recording, this bundle provides a complete working environment without additional software purchases.
For a detailed breakdown of the Solo Gen 4's specifications, see our Focusrite Scarlett Solo Gen 4 review.
Best for: Solo guitarists, singer-songwriters, and producers who need one instrument and one mic input. The ideal first interface for guitarists entering home recording.
Limitations: Only one Hi-Z input; no MIDI ports; no DSP processing.
2. Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Gen 4 β Best All-Rounder
Price: $199
The Scarlett 2i2 Gen 4 adds a second channel to the Solo's feature set, giving you two combination XLR/TRS inputs on the front panel that switch between microphone and Hi-Z instrument mode via front-panel buttons. This configuration lets you record guitar on channel one and a microphone on channel two simultaneously β the correct setup for recording guitar and vocals at the same time, or for re-amping a DI signal while recording a new take on the second input.
The 2i2 Gen 4 includes the same Auto Gain and 69dB preamp gain as the Solo, with the addition of Clip Safe β a feature that monitors the input signal and automatically reduces gain if a clip event is detected, protecting against distorted recordings during energetic playing. The Clip Safe feature is particularly useful for guitarists who dig in hard on aggressive passages and may occasionally drive the input harder than intended.
The Direct Monitor button on the 2i2 toggles between mono and stereo monitoring β useful for guitarists who want to hear their amp sim in stereo through headphones while monitoring their performance. The 2i2's headphone output is driven by a dedicated amplifier that can power most consumer and prosumer headphones without audible noise or lack of drive.
The software bundle includes Ableton Live Lite, Pro Tools Intro, and the Hitmaker Expansion with plugins from iZotope, Antares, Softube, and others β the same package as the Solo, representing substantial value for a new recording setup.
At $199, the 2i2 Gen 4 represents the best value proposition in the budget guitar interface market. It has been a consistent bestseller at major retailers for multiple consecutive years, not because of marketing but because the combination of build quality, driver reliability, converter performance, and bundle value is difficult to match at this price.
To compare the Solo and 2i2 directly, see our Focusrite Scarlett Solo vs 2i2 comparison.
Best for: Guitarists who also record vocals or other instruments. The most practical all-around choice for most home studio guitarists.
Limitations: No MIDI ports; no DSP processing; two outputs limits routing flexibility for larger setups.
3. Universal Audio Volt 176 β Best for Amp Sim Feel
Price: $249
The Universal Audio Volt 176 is a fundamentally different product from the Scarlett interfaces in one important respect: it includes a genuine hardware 1176-style compressor on the input path. The 1176 peak limiter is one of the most recorded-upon pieces of outboard hardware in music history, appearing on a staggering number of classic guitar recordings across virtually every genre. Universal Audio's onboard Volt compressor is a simplified implementation with a single Vintage button that engages the 1176-style character, but the effect on DI guitar recordings is meaningful and consistent.
When the Vintage 76 compressor is engaged, it applies a moderate compression characteristic to the guitar signal before it reaches the analog-to-digital converter. For rhythm guitar playing, this adds sustain and punch; for lead playing, it smooths out dynamic inconsistencies in pick attack; for clean amp sim tones, it adds a subtle harmonic density that makes clean tones feel fuller. This is analog compression happening in the hardware domain, before the signal ever becomes digital β something no plugin inserted after recording can replicate with perfect accuracy.
The Volt 176 has one Hi-Z instrument input on the front panel, one XLR microphone input, and one TRS line input. Dynamic range is rated at 120dB. The USB-C connection is bus-powered, and the driver performance on both Windows and Mac is consistent with UA's broader reputation for stable, low-latency operation. The interface also ships with a bundle of UA plugins including LUNA recording software and several vintage-modeled processors.
The built-in hardware compressor means you can record guitar with analog compression already baked into the signal, capturing the feel of playing through a tracked-and-compressed recording chain rather than the clinically accurate but sometimes sterile result of a transparent converter-only chain. For guitarists who find pure DI recordings feel lifeless even after extensive amp sim processing, the Volt 176's hardware compression is a meaningful differentiator worth the extra $50 over the Scarlett 2i2.
Best for: Guitarists who want hardware compression character on the way in, amp sim enthusiasts who find pure DI recordings too sterile, and producers familiar with the 1176 compression aesthetic.
Limitations: Only one Hi-Z input; the Vintage 76 mode is a fixed characteristic, not a fully adjustable compressor; slightly bulkier form factor than Scarlett interfaces.
4. Audient iD14 MkII β Best Mid-Range Option
Price: $299
The Audient iD14 MkII occupies the most technically capable position in the sub-$300 category. Audient designs professional large-format console preamps and brings that console heritage directly into the iD14 MkII's Class-A microphone preamplifiers β the same circuit topology used in Audient's ASP8024 Heritage console, scaled down into a desktop interface format.
For guitarists, the iD14 MkII's primary strength is its converter performance. The analog-to-digital conversion dynamic range reaches 129dB β a specification more commonly seen in interfaces costing twice as much. At 129dB, the noise floor is inaudible under any practical recording condition, and the top-end detail in DI guitar captures is noticeably more extended and accurate than what most budget interfaces deliver. High-gain amp simulators in particular benefit from this quality of input: the increased harmonic detail in the DI capture translates directly to more realistic and complex tone when processed through plugins like Neural DSP, TONEX, or the Line 6 Helix ecosystem.
The iD14 MkII has two Class-A preamp channels with combination XLR/TRS inputs, one front-panel Hi-Z JFET instrument input (channel 1), two TRS line inputs on the rear, and two monitor outputs. The front panel scroll wheel provides master output level control β more ergonomic than a standard rotary knob for quickly adjusting monitoring levels during playback. The interface also supports ADAT expansion, allowing eight additional channels from an ADAT-equipped device, which is unusual at this price and makes the iD14 MkII viable as a foundation for an expanding studio.
USB bus-powered, Mac and Windows compatible, with driver performance that matches or exceeds the Scarlett series at low buffer sizes. The iD Mixer software provides direct monitoring, input blend control, and basic routing β functional and stable.
Best for: Guitarists who prioritize converter quality above other factors; producers building toward a larger studio who want ADAT expansion; anyone recording demanding high-gain content for amp sim processing.
Limitations: Only one front-panel Hi-Z instrument input; no hardware DSP processing; software monitoring app is less polished than competitors.
See our full Audient ID14 MK2 review.
5. Universal Audio Apollo Twin X β Best Professional Upgrade
Price: $699 (Duo DSP version)
The Universal Audio Apollo Twin X represents a fundamental change in what an audio interface can do for guitar recording. It is not simply a better converter in a nicer box β it is a hardware DSP platform that runs UAD (Universal Audio DSP) plugin processing in real time, independently of your computer's CPU, at near-zero latency.
For guitarists, the Apollo Twin X's most important feature is Unison preamp technology. Unison is Universal Audio's implementation of impedance modeling at the preamp input stage β it physically reconfigures the input impedance of the Apollo's preamp to match the input characteristics of the amplifier or preamp being emulated. When you load the UA 610-B tube preamp plugin, the Apollo's preamp input impedance changes to match a real 610-B, so the guitar pickup interacts with the emulated impedance exactly as it would with the real hardware. The result is a more authentic playing feel β the guitar's pickup behaves differently against different impedances, and Unison captures that interaction in the analog domain before any digital conversion occurs.
The UAD DSP in the Twin X runs amp simulator plugins from the UAD catalog β including the Marshall Plexi collection, Fender 55 Tweed Deluxe, Friedman Amplification emulations, and the Fuchs Train II β in real time through hardware DSP, adding essentially zero latency to the monitoring chain. Playing through a UAD amp sim on the Apollo Twin X at real-world buffer sizes feels comparable to playing through a hardware amplifier in terms of response time.
The Apollo Twin X has 129dB dynamic range, two Unison-capable preamp inputs, ten outputs including two monitor outs and one headphone out, and connects via Thunderbolt 3. The Thunderbolt connection is important β it provides lower latency and higher bandwidth than USB, with round-trip latency measurements consistently in the 1-2ms range under optimal conditions.
The onboard DSP does have a practical limit. The Duo version (the entry-level Twin X configuration) has two SHARC DSP chips, which provides enough processing for a typical guitar recording session β an amp sim, a cab simulator, a compressor, and a reverb running simultaneously is achievable without DSP overload on the Duo. The Quad version adds two additional SHARC chips and is necessary for more complex parallel processing chains or sessions with multiple simultaneous DSP-heavy tracks.
For a guitarist who is serious about amp sim recording and wants the most authentic-feeling DI guitar experience available without a physical amplifier, the Apollo Twin X is the benchmark product. Its Unison technology addresses the physicality of guitar playing in a way that transparent converter-based interfaces cannot, and the UAD plugin library is among the most respected in the industry for vintage amplifier emulation quality.
For those weighing different recording setups for electric guitar specifically, our guide on how to record electric guitar covers both DI and microphone-based techniques in detail.
Best for: Professional guitarists, serious home studio engineers, producers who want the most authentic DI guitar recording experience available, and anyone who wants to run UAD hardware DSP in their signal chain.
Limitations: Thunderbolt 3 required (not all computers have Thunderbolt); UAD plugins require separate purchase beyond the included bundle; $699 entry price is a significant investment; DSP limit on Duo version constrains complex sessions.
See our full Universal Audio Apollo Twin review.
Additional Options Worth Considering
The five interfaces above cover the most important price points and use cases, but several other products deserve consideration depending on specific requirements.
Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 Gen 4 β Best for Growing Studios
Price: $249
The Scarlett 4i4 Gen 4 steps up from the 2i2 with four analog inputs (two combination preamp inputs plus two rear TRS line inputs), MIDI in and out ports, and improved output routing that supports independent headphone and monitor mixes. For guitarists who also work with synthesizers, drum machines, or external effects units, the MIDI connectivity and additional line inputs make the 4i4 a more complete solution than the 2i2 without a significant price increase. The converter and preamp performance is consistent with the 2i2 Gen 4 β the primary upgrades are connectivity and routing flexibility.
See our Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 Gen 4 review for a full specification breakdown and real-world performance assessment.
SSL 2+ β Best for Guitarists Who Also Mix
Price: $219
Solid State Logic's SSL 2+ brings the 4K Legacy channel strip characteristic β derived from the analog circuitry topology of SSL's 4000 series console β into a desktop interface at $219. For guitarists who are also interested in mixing and understand the SSL console sound, the 4K character switch adds a specific harmonic texture to the input signal that many engineers find flattering on guitars and vocals. The SSL 2+ has two preamp inputs, front-panel Hi-Z switching, and four monitor outputs β supporting two pairs of studio monitors for A/B reference monitoring.
See our full SSL 2 Plus review.
MOTU M2 β Best for Conversion Quality on a Budget
Price: $169
MOTU's M2 is a two-input interface that regularly earns praise from measurement-focused audio engineers for its converter performance relative to price. The M2 features a full-color LCD output meter on the front panel β a professional-level metering display unusual at this price point β and driver performance that competes with interfaces costing significantly more. For guitarists whose primary concern is accurate DI capture quality without the Scarlett brand premium, the MOTU M2 is a serious alternative. One Hi-Z input on the front panel, one standard XLR/TRS combination input, and USB bus power complete the specification.
See our full MOTU M2 review.
Optimizing Your Interface for Amp Simulator Workflows
Owning an appropriate interface is the first step; configuring it correctly for amp simulator use is equally important. Several workflow practices significantly improve the amp sim experience regardless of which interface you own.
Buffer Size Configuration
Set your DAW's audio buffer size to 32 or 64 samples when recording guitar with amp simulators active on the input track. At 44.1 kHz with a modern audio interface, 64 samples yields approximately 4-6ms round-trip latency β below the perceptibility threshold for most players. When mixing or playing back without recording, increase the buffer to 256 or 512 samples to reduce CPU load on the computer. Most modern DAWs allow buffer size switching without restarting the session.
Gain Staging for DI Guitar
DI guitar signals are low-amplitude β a typical passive humbucker pickup driving a 1 MΞ© Hi-Z input produces a signal that peaks around -18 to -12dBFS at moderate playing volume. This is correct behavior; do not try to drive the input into the red. Amp simulators are designed to receive this kind of level and model the amplifier's behavior correctly. Overdriving the interface input before the signal reaches the amp sim plugin changes the signal characteristic and can produce inaccurate tonal results.
Set the interface input gain so that aggressive playing peaks around -12 to -6dBFS on the DAW's input meter. The gain knob on the interface is for adjusting the preamplifier gain β for a direct guitar connection into a Hi-Z input, minimal gain is typically required. The Hi-Z preamp circuit in most interfaces is designed to handle guitar-level signals without additional gain.
Direct Monitoring vs. Low-Latency Amp Sim Monitoring
Direct monitoring routes the input signal from the interface hardware directly to the output, completely bypassing the computer. This produces zero-latency monitoring of the dry guitar signal. For pure practicing or warming up, direct monitoring is ideal. For playing through amp simulators in real time, you must disable direct monitoring (which would cause you to hear the dry signal doubled over the processed signal) and rely on the low-latency driver path through the DAW and the amp sim plugin.
The practical workflow: disable direct monitoring in the interface's control software, set buffer size to 32-64 samples, instantiate your amp sim plugin on the guitar track, and engage input monitoring in your DAW. You will hear the amp sim output through the interface outputs with the low-latency round trip determined by your buffer size setting.
Sample Rate for Guitar Recording
Record guitar at 44.1 kHz or 48 kHz at 24-bit depth. These are the standard settings for music production destined for streaming and digital release. Higher sample rates (88.2 kHz, 96 kHz) do not meaningfully improve guitar recording quality in most practical contexts β the guitar's frequency content is contained well within the bandwidth captured at 44.1 kHz β and they increase file sizes, CPU load for amp sim processing, and session management complexity without audible benefit in the finished recording.
48 kHz is the standard for video production (film, YouTube, podcast); 44.1 kHz is the standard for music (Spotify, Apple Music, CD). Choose your sample rate based on the destination format of your recording.
For a comprehensive discussion of home studio setup including interface configuration, see our guide on how to build a home recording studio.
Hi-Z Inputs Explained: Why They Matter for Guitar
The Hi-Z input is the feature that makes an audio interface suitable for direct guitar recording. Understanding why it matters helps you make better decisions about how to configure your recording chain and avoid common mistakes that degrade tone.
A passive guitar pickup β whether a single-coil or humbucker β is essentially an inductor and a resistor in series, with an internal impedance that varies by frequency. The output level and frequency response of the pickup are directly affected by what impedance it sees at the input it is connected to. When connected to a very high impedance (1 MΞ© or higher), the pickup operates as designed β full output, full frequency response, natural treble extension. When connected to a lower impedance (a standard line input is typically 10-47 kΞ©, a microphone input is even lower at 1-2 kΞ©), the lower impedance loads the pickup, causes a loss of high-frequency content, and reduces the output level significantly.
This loading effect is particularly pronounced with single-coil pickups, which have higher inductance and therefore interact more strongly with load impedance. Plugging a Stratocaster directly into a line-level input without Hi-Z switching engaged produces a noticeably duller, lower-output signal compared to the same guitar through a proper Hi-Z input. Humbuckers are somewhat less sensitive to loading but still benefit significantly from a proper 1 MΞ© Hi-Z input.
Active pickups β found in many high-output guitars β have a built-in preamp buffer that lowers the output impedance of the pickup before it leaves the guitar. Active pickups are less sensitive to load impedance and can connect to standard TRS line inputs without the same tonal degradation. However, there is no downside to using a Hi-Z input with active pickups β it will not cause any problems, and consistent connection habits are easier to maintain.
Piezoelectric pickups, used in acoustic-electric guitars and many electro-acoustic instruments, have extremely high impedance β often 5-10 MΞ© β and are even more sensitive to input loading than passive magnetic pickups. Some dedicated acoustic guitar interfaces and DI boxes offer input impedances of 10 MΞ© specifically to accommodate piezo pickups. For standard magnetic guitar pickups, 1 MΞ© is sufficient and is the specification found in essentially all interfaces on this list.
The practical rule: always connect a guitar with passive magnetic pickups to the Hi-Z instrument input. Never connect a passive guitar directly to a standard XLR microphone input or line-level TRS input without a Hi-Z switching option. The tonal difference is not subtle and is the single most common source of complaints about "my guitar sounds dull on recordings."
For more information on recording techniques specifically for electric guitar, including microphone placement on amplifiers and hybrid DI-and-mic approaches, see our guide on recording electric guitar.
Buying Guide: Choosing the Right Interface for Your Setup
The right interface depends on your specific situation. The following decision framework covers the most common scenarios guitarists encounter when choosing an interface.
You Are a Guitarist Just Starting With Home Recording
Buy the Focusrite Scarlett Solo Gen 4 at $129. It has everything you need β one Hi-Z input, one mic preamp, low latency, a complete software bundle, and a build quality that will outlast your first several years of recording. Do not overthink this choice; the interface is not the limiting factor in your recordings at this stage.
You Want to Record Guitar and Vocals Simultaneously
Buy the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Gen 4 at $199. The two independent inputs on the same interface let you run guitar on channel one and a microphone on channel two, recording both simultaneously into separate tracks in your DAW for independent processing. This is the standard home recording setup for singer-songwriters and guitarist-vocalists.
You Use Amp Simulators as Your Primary Guitar Tone Tool
Consider the Universal Audio Volt 176 at $249 if you want hardware compression character on the DI signal, or the Audient iD14 MkII at $299 if you prioritize maximum converter clarity and detail for amp sim processing. If budget allows and you want the most authentic amp sim feel, the Apollo Twin X at $699 with Unison technology is the purpose-built solution.
You Have a Growing Studio With Multiple Instruments
The Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 Gen 4 at $249 adds MIDI ports and two rear TRS line inputs for connecting synthesizers and outboard gear. The iD14 MkII's ADAT expansion capability makes it a strong option if you anticipate needing more than two analog inputs in the future.
You Are Upgrading From an Existing Budget Interface
If you already own a working Scarlett 2i2 or similar budget interface and are considering an upgrade, the most meaningful upgrade path is to the Audient iD14 MkII (for converter quality improvement) or the Apollo Twin X (for Unison technology and UAD DSP processing). Upgrading from one budget interface to another within the same tier typically yields diminishing returns β the practical difference between a well-designed $150 interface and a well-designed $200 interface is smaller than the effort of switching would justify.
For a broader perspective on building out your recording setup beyond the interface, our guide to the best audio interfaces for home studios covers multi-purpose interface selection across all use cases.
Guitarists recording acoustic as well as electric guitar should also read our guide to recording acoustic guitar, which covers microphone selection, placement, and room treatment considerations that apply specifically to acoustic instruments.
Practical Exercises
Compare Hi-Z vs. Line Input Tone
Connect your guitar to the Hi-Z instrument input on your interface and record a 30-second DI clip of clean picking. Then connect the same guitar to a standard TRS line input (if your interface has one with switchable Hi-Z off) and record the same passage. Load both clips in your DAW and listen on headphones β the difference in high-frequency clarity and output level demonstrates exactly why Hi-Z inputs exist and why they matter for guitar recording.
Latency Threshold Test for Amp Sims
Open your DAW, instantiate an amp simulator plugin on your guitar track, and play through it with your interface buffer size set to 256 samples. Record your subjective feel of the response. Then reduce the buffer to 64 samples and play again. Finally try 32 samples. Document the buffer size at which the amp sim starts to feel genuinely responsive to your playing β this is your personal latency threshold and determines the minimum driver performance requirement for your real-time guitar workflow.
Re-Amping Chain Evaluation
Record a 60-second DI guitar performance at 24-bit/44.1 kHz with careful gain staging (peaks at -12dBFS). Re-amp this clip through three different amp simulator plugins β for example, Neural DSP Archetype, TONEX, and Line 6 Helix Native β with identical cabinet and EQ settings, exporting a processed clip from each. A/B the three results on calibrated studio monitors and evaluate how the quality of your DI capture affects the amp sim result: any noise, converter coloration, or frequency response anomalies in the source clip will be amplified and revealed by the amp sim processing, making this test an effective converter quality evaluation tool.